Topic: Quantitative Emperical Research Article
| Style | APA |
| Number of words | 1260 |
| Number of sources | 2 |
| Spacing | Double |
| PowerPoint slides | 0 |
SOCW 6301: Week 10 Assignment Guidelines
Quantitative Article Review and Critique
In approximately 7-10 pages (including title page and references), address the
following questions.
Title
After reading the entire article, do you think the title adequately describes
the study? Does the title catch your attention? Please explain.
Abstract
Does the abstract contain the recommended content (see “Abstract,”
pp. 314, in Yegidis et al.)? How difficult do you think it is to
summarize so much information in 150–250 words? Please explain.
Introduction
Why did the authors conduct this study and write this article? What was the
problem of interest or concern? Be specific. Use quotes and paraphrases
with citations. What audience might be interested in this study?
Do you feel the problem is significant enough to warrant a journal article?
Did you have a “so what” reaction? If so, why do you think it was accepted
for publication? Please justify your position.
To what extent does the literature presented in the introduction help you
understand the problem? How does the literature reviewed put the problem
in context? Be specific.
Does the researcher indicate how this research is different from and/or
similar to earlier ones reported in the literature? Summarize what this
article intends to add to the knowledge base.
Do the authors state their research questions and/or hypotheses? What
are the hypotheses or focused research questions?
Methods
What specific quantitative method is used? How does a quantitative
research design correspond with the research questions or hypotheses?
Can you determine whether the design was appropriate?
© 2016 Laureate Education, Inc. 2 of 3
To what extent can the design answer the research questions or
address the stated hypotheses? Elaborate.
What were the variables understudy? If relevant, identify the main dependent
and independent variables. If not relevant, why are there no dependent and
independent variables? What instruments or observations were used in the
research? Explain why you do, or do not, think that the methods used to
collect the data are described clearly enough to allow for replication. Be
specific and please elaborate.
Explain whether or not the information was provided concerning the reliability and
validity of these instruments or observations. Was this information adequate?
How does the presence or absence of information about reliability and validity
affect your confidence in the quality of the study? What have the authors
done to address or strengthen internal validity? Be specific.
Sample
How were the participants recruited or selected for the study? What sampling
strategy was used? Is the sample large enough to address the hypotheses
and research questions? Did the author(s) offer any justification for the
sample size? Are you satisfied with the information reported about the
sample? What questions might you have about the sample that were not
addressed? Please be sure to provide an explanation for all of your answers.
Are the demographics of the participants (e.g., background characteristics
such as age, race, etc.) described in sufficient detail? If so, how is the
presentation of this descriptive data useful in evaluating the research? If not,
please explain how that may affect the evaluation of the research.
Was the sample reflective of the population from which it was drawn? Is
representativeness important in this research? Please explain.
Please explain any ethical concerns you may have about the sample and how
the sample was recruited.
Results
How were the data analyzed? (What statistical techniques were used?)
Be specific.
Explain how easy or difficult it was for you to understand the reporting of
results. What questions do you have after reading the results section? Please
elaborate.
Do you feel the results of this study have meaning for social
work practitioners or managers? Please elaborate.
© 2016 Laureate Education, Inc. 3 of 3
Discussion
Explain whether or not the authors made sense of their data in the discussion
section. Explain why you think the conclusions are (or are not) reasonable.
Did the authors discuss the limitations of their study? Did they stay within
the limitations of their findings, or did they make more of their findings than
was warranted? Please elaborate.
Did the author(s) suggest issues that future research should consider? If
so, were there any surprises? Please elaborate.
Image preview for “what instruments or observations were used in the research?”
