Emergency Management #2
| Style | APA |
| Number of words | 1691 |
| Number of sources | 0 |
| Spacing | Double |
| PowerPoint slides | 0 |
Question
The Portfolio Project involves conducting research on emergency management procedures developed by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Cadets will conduct an analysis of the emergency management organization by using emergency management theories and frameworks. The cadet will also implement suggestions to the planning of the emergency management procedures by either changing and/or incorporating the effective strategic approach
Please see the attachment file to learn how to write the project as well as the other file to take the necessary information from it.
The specific topics in the attached file are, for example, the topics you will write about are terrorism, floods, and desertification.
All the data you need is in the attachment, notice that each CILO should be in a single part or page. And this is the rubric
Assessment will be graded according to the rubric below which covers CILO 1, 2, 3 and 4
Criteria
Unsatisfactory
Baseline
Developing
Good
Exemplary
Problem
[2.2.1]
No hazards were identified.
One hazard was identified.
Multiple hazards identified
…and linked to specific vulnerabilities
…and consequent risks discussed.
Measure
[2.2.3]
No initiatives were identified.
One initiative was identified (either mitigation or response).
Multiple initiatives identified (including both mitigation and response)
…with appropriate and realistic implementation detailed
…and contingency plans developed including discussion of why/when they are necessary.
Role
[2.2.3]
No roles were assigned.
One role/ responsibility apportioned.
Multiple roles/ responsibilities apportioned
…with communication/ coordination plan detailed
…and potential overlaps/ gaps discussed.
Criteria
Unsatisfactory
Baseline
Developing
Good
Exemplary
Theory
[1.3.1]
No element was identified.
Identify one element of relevant theory.
Explain multiple elements of relevant theory
…with reference to specific sources
…and discuss relevance to specific initiatives.
Experience
[2.2.2]
No example identified.
Identifies one relevant past example.
Describe multiple relevant past examples
…with details supported by reference to specific sources
…and discuss relevance to specific initiatives.
Criteria
Unsatisfactory
Baseline
Developing
Good
Exemplary
Standards
[2.2.4]
No criterion identified.
One criterion identified.
Identify multiple external criteria
…explain the extent of the plan’s compliance
…and justify divergences from criteria.
Scope
[2.2.4]
No aspects of coverage were identified.
One aspect of coverage was identified.
Identify multiple aspects of coverage
…and explain how the plan addresses these aspects
…and discuss trade-offs involved in extending coverage that limit feasibility.
Risk
[2.2.4]
No risks were identified.
One risk was identified.
Identify multiple new risks created by strategy
…and compare magnitude and probability of suite of risks before and after
…and discuss why the new risk profile represents the best available outcome in terms of trade-offs in risk profiles.
Criteria
Unsatisfactory
Baseline
Developing
Good
Exemplary
Cogency
[4.1.2]
No apparent organization of ideas.
One link between ideas is clear.
Links among ideas make the message clear and easy to follow
…and provide focused, relevant, explanations and support to the argument
…and frame the argument within the context of a broader discourse.
Template
[4.1.3]
No apparent observance of standards.
Irregular observance of a limited range of standards.
Regular observance of all common standards
…with demonstrated attention to detail
…and skillful adaptation to specific contexts.
Style
[4.1.1]
No apparent observance of standard conventions of formal written style.
Irregular observance of the most obvious and common conventions of formal written style.
Consistent observance of most conventions of formal written style
…with word choice appropriate to the intended audience
…and constructions displaying variety, suitability, and fluency.
Image preview for”explain multiple elements of relevant theory”
