details below
For your initial post, consider the scenario below and answer the questions in italics:
“When a riot occurs in prison, the inmates sometimes seize a guard or other prison employee and hold that person during the period of the riot. Not all the inmates will directly participate in seizing or holding the guard, even if they otherwise participate in the riot. When the riot is quelled, what charges can be brought against the inmates? What should the government have to prove to convict an inmate of these charges? See Comm. v. Spearin, 846 N.E.2d 390 (Mass. 2006).”
On separate Paper as 2 answers
Ask an analytical question.
Elaborate on a particular point
Be sure to support your initial post and follow-up posts with scholarly examples from the module readings and additional literature where appropriate. You must cite all references according to APA style.
Solution Preview
It is the responsibility of the prison guards to keep the place in order and act upon any cases of violence that might affect its running. When inmates are out of control, they end up engaging in riots within the cells and cause harm to each other or the guards. The law clearly states that it is wrong for a prisoner to bring chaos in the midst of a sentence and if it gets to some extremes, it might increase even more charges (Perl, 2007). In most cases when inmates have decided to break out, they might consider seizing an officer with his or her gun. Regardless of whether the guard is hurt or not, the inmates responsible are charged with an offense and can be prosecuted according to the extents of the damages.
(315 words)