two discussion

250 words each

First one: Juries and Homosexuals

Do you think juries are biased against homosexuals? Consider juries in different cities, states, and communities. What do you think about the homosexual advance theory – should offenders’ responsibility be reduced for the crime they committed if the victim made a sexual advance toward them? Why or why not?

Provide at least one reference in your post.

2nd: Prosecution of Hate Crimes

Let’s discuss hate crimes.

Why do we classify hate crimes differently than other crimes? What enhancement to punishment exists in DC for hate crime cases (according to the article and video)?

The article states that in DC, very few hate crime cases get prosecuted. Why do you think that is?

Now do some research about hate crime statistics in another state, city, or in the US overall. What do the statistics tell us?

Lastly, in your opinion, is hate crime legislation necessary?

Solution Preview

Many are the times’ juries have been accused of being biased when it comes to matters involving homosexuality. In states such as the United States, there have been several accusations on the juries for being biased in handling cases that include gays or even a person who is gay. This paper seeks to explain the juries take on cases involving homosexually and hate crime cases.

(668 words)