In 200 words, answer those two questions below
— In 200 words, answer those two questions below: Instructions: First, read the attachment I send to you. The 200 most based the attachment of “MAPP V. OHIO” I send to you.
After reading Mapp v. Ohio (1961) [Book 2], explain the following: (a) what constitutional amendment is being discussed in the case, and what right (s) does it cover? (b) What did the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in this case and why? (c) The Court must balance the protection of the rights of individuals against the welfare of society. If the police had not searched Mapp’s house, they would never have found the obscene material. With this in mind, do you think Mapp’s rights or society should have been more critical? Explain
Instructions:
First, read the attachment I send to you. The 200 most based the attachment of “MAPP V. OHIO” I send to you.
You must answer the questions thoroughly and cite all relevant assigned readings for that week (using APA format).
You may also refer to outside sources as long as they are scholarly (e.g., peer-reviewed journals) and/or reputable (e.g., article from The New York Times, chapter from another textbook). DO NOT refer to or incorporate information from extremely unreliable sources (e.g., Wikipedia, TMZ, and The Onion).
Posts must be well written, free of grammatical errors, relevant to the topic, and demonstrate critical thinking and analysis.
Required Textbooks: POLICING: Searches; Surveillance; Profiling
Book 2 – Israel et al. (2016): Chapter 3
1. Israel, J. H., Kamisar, Y., LaFave, W. R., King, N. J., & Primus, E. B. (2016).
Criminal Procedure and the Constitution: Leading Supreme Court Cases and Introductory
Text. West Academic Publishing. (ISBN: 9781634607544)
B. Suggested Readings:
1. D’Argenio, C., Owens, D., & Chin, J. (2012). Contemporary Issues in Criminal
Justice. Looseleaf Law Publications. (ISBN: 9781608850341)
2. Garner, B. (2011). Black’s Law Dictionary. West. (ISBN: 9780314275448)
3. Reiman, J., & Leighton, P. (2012). The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison:
Ideology, Class & Criminal Justice. Routledge. (ISBN: 9780205137725)
Solution Preview
The constitutional amendment that is evident in the case would be the Fourth Amendment which ensures that the citizens are protected from searches and seizures of property that will be deemed unreasonable (Israel, Kamisar, LaFave, King, & Primus, 2016). The fact in issue of this case was whether the confiscated items which were found on the property would fall under the protection of the First Amendment
(404 words)