2 cases: 1 case courts ruling on a motion fir summary judgment 2: party requested a mistrail

2 cases: 1 case courts ruling on a motion fir summary judgment 2: party requested a mistrail

This week you’ve learned quite a bit about various motions, including motions for summary judgment and motions for mistrial. Research two cases from your state: one case should be the court’s ruling on a motion for summary judgment, and the other should be the court’s ruling in a case where a party requested a mistrial. Explain each case in the forum, and for each case include the following:

The case name
Facts of the case
The question presented by the case
The court’s analysis
The court’s holding
How you would have ruled if you were the judge in the case
What you learned from the case

STATE IS MN (Minnesota)

Solution Preview

In the case of Offerdahl versus The University of Minnesota, the petitioner had begun using an intrauterine device which had been inserted by a different institution. After the insertion of the invention, the petitioner experienced abdominal pains. She was admitted to the University Hospital of the Minnesota which was a hospital located in the school where she pursued her higher learning.

(896 words)