According to article, There’s no evidence that immigrants hurt any American workers

According to article, There’s no evidence that immigrants hurt any American workers

According to article, There’s no evidence that immigrants hurt any American workers
1. What accounts for the difference between Peri and Yasenov’s conclusion and Borjas’ conclusion? Thoroughly discuss the various factors that influenced the results of those two studies.
2. Why does Michael Clemens claim that even if no ones wage actually changed, George Borjas’ data would nevertheless have shown a decrease in the average wage after 1980?
NOTE: Your grade will be based solely on your objective analysis of the questions in the prompt and rubric.

Solution Preview

Immigration and Wages

In the article, “There’s no evidence that immigrants hurt any American workers”, economists Giovani Peri and Vasil Yasenov’s concluded that the average wages of low-skilled workers in Miami rose after the wave of immigration in 1980. On the other hand, George Borjas claims that the wages of these low-skilled workers dropped. They came up with different results for the same study because they used different factors that led to contradicting results. Borjas used a substantially small sample in his study whereas Peri and Yasenov included a larger sample.

(590 words)