answer the following question.
What are some examples of situations in which a court has taken judicial notice of historical facts? Is the judge required to take judicial notice of historical facts? Explain.
Are the courts more reluctant to permit the use of judicial notice in criminal cases as compared to civil cases? What do you think? If not, why not and if so, why?
Solution Preview
JUDICIAL NOTICE
Judicial notice is a law that allows the court to recognize a fact as true without the need for further proof. Judicial notice is normally requested before it is approved but there are cases this norm is not followed. It is requested by either party of the case so that the can depend on a particular fact to win the case. A judicial notice includes accepting not only recent facts but also the historical ones, (Reiter, 2010). Some of the instances where the court has taken judicial notice of historical facts include the events following the 9/11, the recession in the 1930s, the antagonism in Korea in 1950, the battle in Croatia after its independence in 1991, and the United States’ financial history in 1929.
(355 words)