choose one of the topic

choose one of the topic

This discussion board is open for any questions or comments in a new thread, but please address the following:

1. Do you agree with the decision in the Costa v. Boston Red Sox case? Why or why not?

2. Is it a good business decision for the Red Sox not to voluntarily pay for the injuries sustained by innocent spectators? Should they get an insurance policy for such injuries and absorb the costs as part of their business plan? Why or why not?

3. Should the court have dismissed the injury warning on the ticket in the case? Do you think Costa really had no idea that a ball could possibly come her way? Will signs in the stadium make any difference? How should businesses be required to warn their customers of these kinds of dangers?

Solution Preview

The Costa v. Boston Red Sox case
I support the court’s decision in the Costa v. Boston Rd Sox Case as the plaintiff, Jane Costa had the responsibility to ensure her safety within the baseball park. In the case, the defendant claimed that the receipt had a warning at the back, which the complainant ignored.

(351 words)