What ethical consideration(s) should have been included?
Format: APA
sources: 2
Pages: 2
Spacing: Double spaced
Topic: Reply to Colleague Ivelis-AshCL5WK1D1-1
Details: This assignment must be a minimum of 500 words. Please read Colleague Ivelis post to week 1 discussion 1(Colleague Ivelis post attached). Then respond to Colleague Ivelis post considering the following:
• Were the theories complementary, or did they exist in conflict?
• Provide specific examples of divergence between the theories as described.
• Were there associated issues and/or cultural considerations your colleague did not mention that should have been included in his or her initial post?
• What ethical consideration(s) should have been included?
• How does your explanation of classical and operant conditioning differ from your peers’ explanations?
Reply-to-Colleague-Ivelis-ASHCL5WK1D1-1(1)
Image preview for what ethical consideration(s) should have been included?
APA
660 words