Description of The god delusion by Richard Dawkins
Description
the god delusion By Richard Dawkins
What is the thesis or main argument of the book? if the author wanted you to get one.
idea from the book, what would it be? How does it compare or contrast to the world you know? What has the book accomplished?
What exactly is the subject or topic of the book? Does the author cover the subject adequately? Does the author cover all aspects of the subject in a balanced fashion?
What is the approach to the subject(topical, analytical, chronological, descriptive)?
How Does the author support her argument? What evidence does he use to prove his point ?
Do you find that evidence convincing? why or why not? Does any of the author’s information (or conclusions) conflict with other books you’ve read, courses you’ve taken or just previous assumptions you had of the subject?
How does the author structure her argument? what are the parts that make up the whole? Does the argument make sense? Does it persuade you? Why or Why not? How has this book helped you understand the subject? Would you recommend the book to your reader? How does his view and you’re conflict in religion? what is the author view in philosophy of religion?
What is the thesis or main argument of the book? if the author wanted you to get one.
idea from the book, what would it be? How does it compare or contrast to the world you know? What has the book accomplished?
What exactly is the subject or topic of the book? Does the author cover the subject adequately? Does the author cover all aspects of the subject in a balanced fashion?
What is the approach to the subject(topical, analytical, chronological, descriptive)?
How Does the author support her argument? What evidence does he use to prove his point ?
Do you find that evidence convincing? why or why not? Does any of the author’s information (or conclusions) conflict with other books you’ve read, courses you’ve taken or just previous assumptions you had of the subject?
How does the author structure her argument? what are the parts that make up the whole? Does the argument make sense? Does it persuade you? Why or Why not? How has this book helped you understand the subject? Would you recommend the book to your reader? How does his view and you’re conflict in religion? what is the author view in philosophy of religion?
Solution Preview
The main argument in the book by Dawkins is that there is no any Supreme Being, or creator who happens to be supernatural at all. He also talks of any personal trust or extraordinary…
(1139 Words)