You are to write your Peer Paper Evaluation knowing that your instructor has already read the paper.
Critical analysis of the report
You are to write your Peer Paper Evaluation knowing that your instructor has already read the paper. There is no need to re-state the paper’s argument as you have done in writing an annotated bibliographic reference or an abstract, but rather, your evaluation is to be primarily about describing the worth and/or problems you see in the paper as it treats its topic. You are to evaluate the argument, how the paper’s thesis is developed, and the way the paper is put together.
what your Peer’s Paper Evaluation is to be – this does not mean that your evaluation is meant to be ‘critical’ in the common pejorative sense of the word. What it means is that you need to use what you write to explore the findings and arguments of your fellow student’s paper. You are to create an intellectual dialogue between the essay and your Peer Student Evaluation. As in the writing of your own essay, you will be asking the question, “is this true”, “is this proven”, and “what other things should be considered?”
Must include in Critical Analysis
a. Insights into strengths and weaknesses of the essay
b. Appropriateness of comments (academic)
c. Completeness of aspects assessed
All of the insights and opinions that you offer in your Peer’s Paper Evaluation are to exhibit the same high standards for objectivity as were required for essays. The text of your Peer’s Paper Evaluation is to be 650 words, +/- 20 words.
Image preview for”you are to write your Peer Paper Evaluation knowing that your instructor has already read the paper.“
APA
722 words