explain the difference between normative ethics and meta-ethics.

explain the difference between normative ethics and meta-ethics.

In 500 words or more (no less), explain the difference between normative ethics and meta-ethics. You may use examples, but you will still need to include a full scholarly definition of each with commentary. You are required to attach as a separate document an annotated bibliography. Using the resource center and Google Scholar (or similar scholarly tools), create an annotated bibliography with 5 sources related to an overview of the ethical theory of the week. You must cite your references using APA formatting

Solution Preview

Normative and Meta Ethics

Ethics, the basis for most of our moral judgments as human beings, inform our moral code. Morals are socially accepted behaviors and are the basis for normative judgments.  In philosophy today, ethics is the field in which concepts of right or wrong are systemized, defended, and recommended. Normative ethics is the practical evaluation of the moral standards upon which the society determines right and wrong — normative, which is a term used to describe the ordinary view of things. Meta-ethics deals with the source and meaning of our ethical principles. There are various types of ethics, and the purpose of this essay is to explore and bring forth the difference between normative and meta-ethics using examples and scholarly definitions.

Normative ethics is the determination of our moral behavior and the content therein (Cavalier, 2014).

(677 words)