PSY 699 WEEK 2 Discussion Reply To Instructor Dr. B questions to my post
Assignment Details: Hello Mary, (PLEASE ANSWER MY INSTRUCTOR QUESTION FROM MY POST BELOW)
You mentioned conflicting objectives as a potential pitfall. Can you provide an example using a specific diagnosis and provide a rationale for why there might be conflicting goals between professionals to illustrate your point.
I do agree that intervention and education for PCP’s are vital. What topics should the education focus on and why? How might the interventions be implemented?
How might the improved quality of care for clients also enhance career satisfaction?
I look forward to your response. Please use supporting literature.
Dr. B.
*************************************************************************************
Focus on Integrative and Collaborative Care
The implementation of an integrated care (IC) program allows different providers to collaborate to attain patients’ health needs. The healthcare teams achieve therapeutic goals for individual clients by coordinating primary care practices to improve the patient’s wellbeing (Auxier et al., 2011). Also, they improve efficiency in service delivery, which reduces delays and minimizes medication errors. As a result, the collaborative efforts enhance clients’ satisfaction. Similarly, the IC programs support health literacy as it entails sharing and coordinating knowledge and skills from different providers. It allows healthcare professionals to establish effective solutions and better decisions when handling critical health situations. Nonetheless, there are various factors that contribute to the failure of the (IC) delivery model. For instance, insufficient resources and finances, conflicting objectives, and lack of commitment by various healthcare providers hinder the success of IC programs.
Additionally, there are various factors that impact the efficacy of the IC delivery model. For instance, the inability of the stakeholders to accept the value of the collaborative healthcare approach limits the capacity to implement the program. The withdrawal of the much-needed support affects the viability of the IC model. Secondly, the efficiency of integrative care is restricted by the reduced clinical competencies of some individuals within the team (Auxier et al., 2011). The critical issues in the IC model arise when healthcare providers collaborate with less-proficient professionals; hence, limiting them from focusing on common healthcare goals. Thirdly, an inefficient financial system affects the planning and budgeting of the programs, while inadequate support services limit the progress and coordination of the activities. Therefore, the support interventions for such issues entail education and training to create awareness and competency of the team members. Besides, the institution must identify effective stakeholders, and implement effective financial systems that guarantee success.
The methods of targeted intervention and education for primary care physicians (PCPs) are vital for alleviating the potential issues for the integrative care model. The PCPs work as part of a healthcare team; hence, they must attain maximum awareness and expertise to effectively collaborate with other medical and surgical specialists. Therefore, the intervention and education constitute diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making, where the PCPs are equipped with bioethical skills in interpreting patients’ symptoms (Runyan, 2011). Besides, they learn coordination of care and teamwork, as they are demanded to operate with other care providers. In most scenarios, the effectiveness of the PCPs in a team determines the success of the healthcare intervention. Additionally, the education for the primary care physicians constitutes advanced procedures, where they attain skills and knowledge to assist in critical healthcare situations. Such interventions enhance competencies in the PCPs.
The process on decision-making in complex situations must be guided by the APA Ethical Code of Conduct. For instance, standard 2.01 on boundaries of competence demands the professionals to establish their findings and conclusions from scientific knowledge and education experience (APA, 2017). As a result, the decisions must be evidence-based, and well-evaluated from the patient’s symptoms and physical health. Besides, provision 3.04 requires the primary care physicians to avoid harm by ensuring the decisions minimize adverse implications from the healthcare interventions. Therefore, the provider must avoid degrading behaviors that could result to physical and mental suffering for the patients. The IC delivery model is evident in long-term care setting, where patients require the attention of several providers throughout their recovery journey. It enhances job satisfaction because each professional understand his/her specific role during the coordination process.
Image preview for”how might the improved quality of care for clients also enhance career satisfaction? “
APA
439 words