help with this assignment

Feagin, J. R. (2010). The white racial frame: Centuries of racial framing and counter-framing. Preface (vi-ix); Ch. 1 (pp. 1-3 [stop @ “mainstream social science”]; optional pp. 9-21); Ch. 2 (pp. 23-37 )
Kim, C. (1999). The Racial Triangulation of Asian Americans. (pp. 105 – 122 [stop at “3.2 Affirmative Action”)
Pulido, L. (2006). Black, Brown, Yellow, and Left: Radical Activism in Los Angeles (pp. 15-33 )
Powell, J. (2013). Deepening our understanding of structural marginalization. (pp. 1-3 )

Note: Feel free to create a Sketchboard (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.(instead of a written CRR) in response to the CRR questions. You can then use Screencastify to narrate how the images/symbols and connections you make answer the questions below. Then, you can submit the link to your screencast through this assignment page.

Questions to Answer:

What is the white racial frame and how does it operate?
What is a “field of racial positions” and “racial triangulation”? And how does Kim argue that Asian Americans have been “racially triangulated” within this “field of racial positions”?
What is “differential racialization” and the factors that are part of the processes by which it happens?
What are “racial hierarchies” and the process by which they are created?

Pick Three to Answer:

What is the relationship of Feagin’s theory of the “white racial frame,” and Kim’s notion of “discourse” as a process that generates a “field of racial positions”?
What does Kim argue are the key processes by which Asian Americans experience “racial triangulation”?
What are the relationships between the white racial frame and the model minority myth?
How does Pulido argue that the process of racialization is one that is distinctive and specific?
How does going beyond the Black/White binary relate to powell’s statements regarding our need to move past “disparities” into deeper understandings of “structural marginalization”?
Pulido argues that there is a dialectic that occurs between processes of class formation and racial ideologies. What examples does she use to support this claim?

Rubric

CRR 5 Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnswer CRR QuestionsAnswered all CRR questions in a thorough Manner.

8.0 to >0.0 ptsFull Marks

Demonstrates a clear understanding of the readings and the author’s main points by answering CRR questions using textual evidence (e.g., direct quotes, and passage paraphrasing) to support these points and explicit citations to the texts.

0.0 ptsDoes not demonstrate

Does not demonstrate a clear understanding of the reading. Does not articulate author’s main points. Does not use textual evidence to support assertions/arguments/analysis. Does not use citations to text.

8.0pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeText ConversationsPlace texts in conversation with each other.

6.0 to >0.0 ptsFull Marks

Compares, contrasts, and synthesizes assigned texts in relation to each other to demonstrate expanded understandings of key concepts/theories that a single reading does not provide. For example, “Grande’s theory of Red Pedagogy paired with Marx’s Theory of Historical Materialism allow us to understand x, y, and z about capitalism and schooling.”

0.0 ptsDoes not place texts in conversation

Does not compare, contrast, or synthesize the assigned texts to demonstrate the ways in which the pairing of texts allow us a greater understanding of theories or concepts presented in each text.

6.0pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConversation with the textsIndividual analysis of texts

6.0 to >0.0 ptsFull Marks

Draws on readings and other content, e.g., current events, in relation to personal experiences to include individual, thoughtful analysis and interpretations of the texts under examination for CRR.

0.0 ptsConversation with the texts

Does not draw on the reading, current events, and personal experience to analyze and interpret the text’s theories/key concepts.

20181002014332powell_deepening_our_understanding_of_structural_marginalization

20181002014320black_brown_yellow_and_left_radical_activism_in_los_angeles

20181002014243feagin_ch.2

Solution Preview

Racial Issues

Part 1

The white racial frame is the continuous perception of white supremacy and hegemony of other races by the dominant whites. Since the arrival of white Europeans into the Americas, they have always dominated other races, primarily based on their access to resources (Feagin 1). Consequently, the perception of white superiority by other races has led them to seek association through assimilation, in which the white race often lifts its standards relative to others. Ultimately, the white frame is no different from a standard of the perception of races.

(911 words)