holistic health
(Part Two critical critique any of these websites)
https://www.
https://news.google.com/
Critically analysing a website for your assignment tasks Critically analysing a website might involve any of the following questions:
· What type of website is this (e.g., government, organisational, etc.)? Might this impact the ideas which are included? How?
· Who contributed to its content? Is this clearly visible?
· Who is likely to view this website (i.e. who is the intended audience)?
· Is the website navigation user-friendly? Why or why not?
· Does this website present its ideas/arguments effectively for the intended audience? Is it convincing? If yes, how? If not, why not?
· How is the information presented on the website (layout and design)? Is this effective? Why?
· Is there any evidence used to support the ideas presented on the website/webpage? What is it?
· Is this website funded or sponsored by an external party? – How might such funding or sponsorship impact the use and presentation of evidence? – Does this create any bias?
NOTE: A website is often less text heavy than other types of sources such as academic journal articles or news articles. Therefore, your critical analysis might focus not just on language, but also on design, layout, and visuals.
It is an annotated essay, use the citation
Solution Preview
Website Critique
Website:
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Health Information. (2017, September 24). Retrieved from https://nccih.nih.gov/health
- What type of website is this (e.g., government, organizational, etc.)? Might this impact the ideas which are included? How?
The chosen website for the critique is one by the United States Department of Health and Human Services. The website is among some of the institutes that are operated by the NIH. It is under the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Since it is a government website, this may impact the ideas that are included.
(471 words)