Question about business
Post A need Need500words
DOC2 is the only resource you may use and cite, do not use any other resource
Do not share this work to anyone or upload this work on any website
Read Doc first, do not miss anything or details. If you have any questions or need anything please let me know
All work is needed written in right format and no errors in grammar, punctuation, word choice, spelling.
Do not use any real name or real company name, for all work you can use “A company” without a name (No need to introduce the company in detail) or use I have Internship in a company.
Do not use too many other resources, use your own words to finish this or change and rewrite it, do not share this work or upload it to any website, and it has to be your original work.
After reading the summary of Collins’ Good to Great and then reading Niendorf and Beck’s assessment of Good to Great, discuss the following:(DOC2)
A. Did Niendorf and Beck’s assessment cause you to view Good to Great differently? Thoroughly discuss why or why not? [up to 20 points]
B. How do you regard what Niendorf and Beck consider “fatal errors” in Good to Great? Thoroughly discuss. [up to 20 points]
C. Do you think Niendorf and Beck were too critical of Good to Great? Thoroughly explain/discuss. [up to 20 points]
D. Following our theme of learning how to critically assess management readings in the popular press, what are some practical take-aways or implications (at least 2) from the combination of these two readings? [up to 40 points]
Grade Determination
• The starting point value associated with each question component is provided in brackets after the question component. Grading anchors for each question component are as follows:
o full credit (100%): Very thorough, in-depth discussion reflecting strong critical thinking (requires a minimum of at least four substantive sentences); answers the question asked
o partial credit (90%): Thorough, in-depth discussion reflecting strong critical thinking (requires a minimum of at least four substantive sentences); answers the question asked
o partial credit (80%): Somewhat thorough, in-depth discussion reflecting moderate critical thinking (requires a minimum of at least three substantive sentences); answers the question asked
o partial credit (70%): Minimally thorough discussion; answers question but reflects little critical thinking (requires a minimum of at least three substantive sentences); answers the question asked
o partial credit (60%): Surface-level discussion; no depth to response/discussion reflecting very little critical thinking; answers the question asked
o no credit (0%): No answer or does not answer the question asked
• Deductions to starting score:
o Use of outside sources (unless otherwise noted in question and/or instructions): automatic zero
o Not writing in complete sentences: 10-point deduction per occurrence
Image preview for”did Niendorf and Beck’s assessment cause you to view Good to Great differently? “
APA
674 words