Project help
| Style | MLA |
| Number of words | 1747 |
| Number of sources | 0 |
| Spacing | Double |
| PowerPoint slides | 0 |
Question
Research the philosophy of Secular Humanism. What do you agree with? What do you disagree with? Where do you see secular humanism influencing art and society – provide specific examples. What do you think of its influence?
Section Project
Section Project
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComprehension
25.0 pts
Clearly understands the topic and explains it with expertise. There is no doubt the writer understands the big picture and the ideas behind the subject being discussed.
20.0 pts
Clearly understands the topic, although explaining it may be a little rough. The writer seems to understand the big picture and the material being discussed.
15.0 pts
Seems to understand the topic. There are some points where the ideas behind the facts come into play, and the writing seems to have a purpose or goal.
10.0 pts
Understands parts of the topic. The writer alludes to ideas or seems to have a purpose, but it is not clearly evident.
5.0 pts
May understand the topic. A careful reading can find references to ideas, and parts of the writing seem to have a purpose, but it is frequently just regurgitating research.
0.0 pts
Doesn’t seem to have a point. Falls into fact listing or fails to show that the writer understands the topic.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking
25.0 pts
The writer demonstrates an ability to analyze and combine information. Something is clearly being explained and taught using examples and evidence to build to an interesting, well expressed idea or point.
20.0 pts
The writing analyzes and combines information, but the author’s ideas are not always clear, innovative, or relevant. There is not a clear purpose or overarching idea in the writing.
15.0 pts
The author states a purpose, but the clear integration of information and the “why” behind the evidence presented is missing or unclear.
10.0 pts
The writing expresses few fresh or integrated ideas. It seems to fall into fact listing or generalization without a clear concept or explanation providing a reason for the writing.
5.0 pts
The writing demonstrates good information, but it fails to find the importance of that information. It does not connect facts or topics and fails to explain what the information means to the reader.
0.0 pts
The writing tends toward fact listing, generalization, or unsupported opinion. It does not innovate or explain and indicates little effort at deeper thought.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport/Evidence
25.0 pts
Relevant evidence from good sources is provided to back up big statements and assertions. It’s clear that the writer has a good point that s/he has adequately supported.
20.0 pts
Some good evidence is provided to support the points made. Some statements could use more evidence, but overall, the support is strong.
10.0 pts
The evidence presented is strong, but either there is too little evidence, or it is not entirely relevant to the idea it is applied to.
5.0 pts
Either there is not enough evidence, or the evidence does not support a point. The author may make broad statements without support, or may list facts without a clear purpose.
0.0 pts
Statements are made without support, or the evidence provided is off-topic or poorly sourced.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat
10.0 pts
Follows MLA format. Includes in-text citations, works cited and uses MLA layout.
5.0 pts
Uses some MLA, but important parts like in-text citations or opening page format are omitted
0.0 pts
No effort is made to follow the required format.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnswering the question
5.0 pts
The writing clearly addresses the question asked. The answer is clear and easy to understand, and the reader knows what topic is being addressed.
3.0 pts
There is an effort to answer the question, but the writing wanders off-topic or falls into fact listing.
2.0 pts
The question is answered, but the answer fails to address some important elements of the question or wanders onto other topics.
0.0 pts
The answer does not address the question asked.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity & Style
5.0 pts
The writing is clear, coherent, interesting, and easy to follow.
3.0 pts
The writing is mostly clear. There are a few points that are confusing or hard to follow, but overall it engages the reader.
2.0 pts
The writing is clear at some points, but some of it is jumbled or confusing.
0.0 pts
It is hard to follow the writing and few connections are made between ideas.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConnection and Care
5.0 pts
The answer shows that the writer took interest in the topic and put effort and personal attention into the work.
3.0 pts
The answer shows some attention and care by the author, but some of it is merely repetition of information without interest.
2.0 pts
Little care is taken in the writing; simple errors are made showing a lack of attention to detail and conveyance of information.
0.0 pts
The writing reads as if it was just done to complete the requirements.
5.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0
Image preview for”what do you agree with?”
Click the purchase button to get full answer.