Read the following passages and answer the three questions in a minimum

The three questions you MUST answer:

1. What can we learn from analyzing primary sources?

2. What are some differences/similarities between travis’s letter, De La Pena’s letter, and Hardin’s analysis of the conflict. Why might these exist?

3. How does the story of the Alamo relate to the present?

Requirements:

This essay must be AT LEAST 600 words, and must have at least THREE paragraphs.

This essay also must be written in the past tense, third person formal style. (No I, We, Us, etc.)

The Introduction should consist of thesis statement, and a brief summary of your argument(s) in support of it.

In the main body(s) be sure to expand the arguments and elaborate on facts supporting your thesis.

(Linked below are the passages you must read to write the essay)

I think I covered everything, just make sure to answer the three questions and meet all of the requirements I listed! If you have any questions feel free to ask! Also, in the PDF I included of the passages you must read to write this essay, just ignore the little notes I made

Solution Preview

Primary Sources on History

Research has always been the primary way through which society gathers information on different events. In some cases, archeology and the consequent artefacts and objects from history have often played a critical role in determining the ways in which events in history unfolded, the consequence of which has often been the development of an image of such events. Consequently, these discoveries then made it to history books in various curriculums and are used in history studies within academic contexts.

(645 words)