Reading Research Literature
Download the research articles from the Chamberlain library.
Retrieve the following research articles: Make sure you are viewing the full text PDF. If you view the article in HTML format, you may not be able to see the tables and figures that are referenced in the questions.
Velayutham, S. G., Chandra, S. R., Bharath, S., & Shankar, R. G. (2017). Quantitative balance and gait measurement in patients with frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer diseases: A pilot study. Indian Journal Of Psychological Medicine, 39(2), 176-182. doi:10.4103/0253-7176.203132. http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=122248443&site=eds-live&scope=site (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Pals, R. S., Hansen, U. M., Johansen, C. B., Hansen, C. S., Jørgensen, M. E., Fleischer, J., & Willaing, I. (2015). Making sense of a new technology in clinical practice: A qualitative study of patient and physician perspectives. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), 1-10. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1071-1 http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=her&AN=109884152&site=eds-live (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Download the Reading Research Literature form (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
Watch the video on how to complete this assignment at http://www.brainshark.com/devry/vu?pi=zGCzbNjK4zHr05z0. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Type answers to the questions directly onto the form. Your form does NOT need to follow APA formatting; however, you are expected to use correct grammar, spelling, syntax, and write in complete sentences.
Please post questions about this assignment to the Q & A Forum.
Save the file by clicking Save as and adding your last name, e.g., NR439_W5_Reading_Research_Literature_Form_Smith.docx.
Submit the completed form by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.
**Academic Integrity Reminder**
Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.
By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment.
Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.
NOTE: Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page.
Rubric
NR439_Reading_Research_Literature
NR439_Reading_Research_Literature
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVelayutham, et al article: Question 1 Purposeview longer description
Correctly identifies the purpose of the research article.
10.0 pts
Mostly identifies the purpose of the research article
9.0 pts
Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research article.
8.0 pts
Offers a purpose for the article, but incorrectly identifies it.
4.0 pts
Does not identify any purpose for the research.
0.0 pts
10.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 2 Research Questionview longer description
Correctly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given.
10.0 pts
Mostly identifies the research question that the author described.
9.0 pts
Somewhat identifies the research question that the author described.
8.0 pts
Offers a research question, but incorrectly identifies it.
4.0 pts
Does not identify any research question.
0.0 pts
10.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 3 Research Designview longer description
Correctly describes the research design of the study.
10.0 pts
Mostly describes the research design of the study.
9.0 pts
Somewhat describes the research design of the study.
8.0 pts
Offers a research design, but incorrectly identifies it.
4.0 pts
Does not identify any research design.
0.0 pts
10.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 4 Populationview longer description
Correctly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.
10.0 pts
Mostly describes identifies and describes the population of the research article.
9.0 pts
Somewhat identifies and describes the population of the research article.
8.0 pts
Offers a population, but incorrectly identifies it as the one in the research article.
4.0 pts
Does not identify any population.
0.0 pts
10.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 5 Sampleview longer description
Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, and if it was adequate.
10.0 pts
Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, but fails to correctly identify if it was adequate.
9.0 pts
Correctly explains the sampling approach, but incorrectly identifies if it was, or was not, appropriate or adequate.
8.0 pts
Misidentifies the sampling approach.
4.0 pts
Doesn’t explain any sampling approach.
0.0 pts
10.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 6 Data Collectionview longer description
Correctly describes the data collection procedure in detail.
10.0 pts
Correctly describes the data collection procedure in general.
9.0 pts
Correctly describes most of the data collection procedure but fails to describe all of it.
8.0 pts
Incorrectly describes the data collection procedure, or omits most of the information.
4.0 pts
Does not describe any data collection procedures.
0.0 pts
10.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 7 Data Analysisview longer description
Correctly describes how the all of the data were analyzed.
10.0 pts
Correctly describes how most of the data were analyzed.
9.0 pts
Describes how the data were analyzed, but may contain some misinformation.
8.0 pts
Describes incorrectly how data were analyzed, or omitted large portions of the information.
4.0 pts
Does not describe how data were analyzed.
0.0 pts
10.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 8 Limitationsview longer description
Correctly describes all of the limitations in the study.
10.0 pts
Correctly describes most of the limitations in the study.
9.0 pts
Correctly describes some of the limitations in the study, but may omit one or two.
8.0 pts
Minimally describes the limitations of the study, or misidentifies them.
4.0 pts
Does not describe any limitations for the study.
0.0 pts
10.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 9 Conclusionsview longer description
Correctly describes all of the authors’ conclusions.
10.0 pts
Correctly describes most of the authors’ conclusions.
9.0 pts
Correctly describes some of the authors’ conclusions, but may omit one or two.
8.0 pts
Minimally describes the author’s conclusions, or misidentifies them.
4.0 pts
Does not describe any author conclusions.
0.0 pts
10.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 10 Advances Knowledgeview longer description
Describes in-depth how this research advances knowledge in the field.
10.0 pts
Generally, describes how this research advances knowledge.
9.0 pts
Briefly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.
8.0 pts
Incorrectly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.
4.0 pts
Does not describe how the research advances knowledge in the field.
0.0 pts
10.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePals et al article: Question 11 Purposeview longer description
Correctly identifies the purpose of the research article.
10.0 pts
Mostly identifies the purpose of the research article
9.0 pts
Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research article.
8.0 pts
Offers a purpose for the article, but incorrectly identifies it.
4.0 pts
Does not identify any purpose for the research.
0.0 pts
10.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 12 Research Questionview longer description
Correctly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given.
10.0 pts
Mostly identifies the research question that the author described.
9.0 pts
Somewhat identifies the research question that the author described.
8.0 pts
Offers a research question, but incorrectly identifies it.
4.0 pts
Does not identify any research question.
0.0 pts
10.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 13 Research Designview longer description
Correctly describes the research design of the study.
10.0 pts
Mostly describes the research design of the study.
9.0 pts
Somewhat describes the research design of the study.
8.0 pts
Offers a research design, but incorrectly identifies it.
4.0 pts
Does not identify any research design.
0.0 pts
10.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 14 Populationview longer description
Correctly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.
10.0 pts
Mostly describes identifies and describes the population of the research article.
9.0 pts
Somewhat identifies and describes the population of the research article.
8.0 pts
Offers a population, but incorrectly identifies it as the one in the research article.
4.0 pts
Does not identify any population.
0.0 pts
10.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 15 Sampleview longer description
Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, and if it was adequate.
10.0 pts
Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, but fails to correctly identify if it was adequate.
9.0 pts
Correctly explains the sampling approach, but incorrectly identifies if it was, or was not, appropriate or adequate.
8.0 pts
Misidentifies the sampling approach.
4.0 pts
Doesn’t explain any sampling approach.
0.0 pts
10.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 16 Data Collectionview longer description
Correctly describes the data collection procedure in detail.
10.0 pts
Correctly describes the data collection procedure in general.
9.0 pts
Correctly describes most of the data collection procedure but fails to describe all of it.
8.0 pts
Incorrectly describes the data collection procedure, or omits most of the information.
4.0 pts
Does not describe any data collection procedures.
0.0 pts
10.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 17 Data Analysisview longer description
Correctly describes how the all of the data were analyzed.
10.0 pts
Correctly describes how most of the data were analyzed.
9.0 pts
Describes how the data were analyzed, but may contain some misinformation.
8.0 pts
Describes incorrectly how data were analyzed, or omitted large portions of the information.
4.0 pts
Does not describe how data were analyzed.
0.0 pts
10.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 18 Limitationsview longer description
Correctly describes all of the limitations in the study.
10.0 pts
Correctly describes most of the limitations in the study.
9.0 pts
Correctly describes some of the limitations in the study, but may omit one or two.
8.0 pts
Minimally describes the limitations of the study, or misidentifies them.
4.0 pts
Does not describe any limitations for the study.
0.0 pts
10.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 19 Conclusionsview longer description
Correctly describes all of the authors’ conclusions.
10.0 pts
Correctly describes most of the authors’ conclusions.
9.0 pts
Correctly describes some of the authors’ conclusions, but may omit one or two.
8.0 pts
Minimally describes the author’s conclusions, or misidentifies them.
4.0 pts
Does not describe any author conclusions.
0.0 pts
10.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 20 Advances Knowledgeview longer description
Describes in-depth how this research advances knowledge in the field.
10.0 pts
Generally, describes how this research advances knowledge.
9.0 pts
Briefly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.
8.0 pts
Incorrectly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.
4.0 pts
Does not describe how the research advances knowledge in the field.
0.0 pts
10.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle and Writingview longer description
Correctly names file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors.
25.0 pts
One to four errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.
22.0 pts
Five to eight errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.
20.0 pts
Nine to twelve errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax
10.0 pts
Thirteen or more errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.
0.0 pts
NR439_W5_Reading_Research_Literature_Form2 (4)
Solution Preview
Reading Research Literature – Week 5
Type your answers to the following questions using complete sentences and correct grammar, spelling, and syntax. Click Save as and save the file with your last name and assignment, e.g.,NR439_Reading_Research_Literature_Smith. Submit by 11:59 pm MT Sunday at the end of Week 5. The guidelines and grading rubric for this assignment may be found on the assignment page.
(983 words)