Unit 4 DB Assignment Details
Primary Discussion Response
The discussion assignment for this week includes a review of the Unit 4 IP completed by one of your classmates, as well as a substantial response to at least one other student.
Primary Task Response: Your first task is to post your own Unit 4 IP Outline to the discussion area so that other students are able to review your plan. Attach your document to the main discussion post, and include any notes you feel are appropriate. The purpose of this assignment is to help improve the quality of the Unit 4 IP Draft you will complete next week.
An effective argumentation essay should include the following elements:
An argument topic
A thesis that holds a claim about a topic and not a personal belief
Evidence and data that is factual and resultant of others’ research to support the writer’s research
All warrants or assumptions in a clear and concise manner
Logical and convincing appeals, avoid writing logical fallacies
Emotional appeals are limited to sincere and appropriate writing and not biased pleadings
Truthful and honest ethical appeals
The correct tone for the audience that the writer is writing for
The conclusion that includes claims, data, warrants, appeals, and recommendations
Correct format (APA, MLA, ACM, and IEEE, etc.).
Academic Writing and Common Essay Types – Writing Support Center – LibGuides at Career Education Corporation
THIS OUTLINE SHOULD BE 400-600 WORDS. Please make sure and answer with a couple of sentences these questions in your outline.
What implemented changes are proffered to affect the topic(s) selected?
Be specific with recommended changes.
Match recommendations with the specific component that you are intending the implementation to affect.
How are the changes valid for the topic(s)? (This is the defense portion and should be significant.)
The positions and changes recommended must be defended with logic and facts.
Facts must all be supported with adequate research sources from legitimate references (cite the facts in APA style in the outline).
Without defended recommendations, this paper will have no merit.
What is the anticipated outcome of the changes for the research topic(s)?
Use logic and deductive approaches to the anticipated outcome.
If you can show something to be so, and it relates to the next step, then the deduction will be strong.
Image preview for”what implemented changes are proffered to affect the topic(s) selected?”
APA
715 words